The text below is copied from Hernando Sun.
Fact Check: 2020 Lie of the Year
Rocco Maglio,01/08/2021
...When
the New York Post broke the story of the Hunter Biden laptop and emails
which implied influence-peddling on the part of Joe Biden while Vice
President, a letter was circulated that was signed by more than 50
former senior intelligence officials. The letter was signed by Jim
Clapper, Former Director of National Intelligence, three Former
Directors of the CIA (Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta, John Brennan), Michael
Morell, Former Acting Director of the CIA, and many former leaders of
intelligence agencies. This letter was reported by Politico journalist
Natasha Bertrand to state that the Hunter Biden laptop story was a
Russian disinformation operation. Disinformation means the information
was false.
After the election former CIA
senior operations officer, Marc Polymeropoulos told the National Review
that he and former acting CIA director Michael Morell (name has been
floated as a possible Biden CIA director pick) basically wrote the
letter. "Polymeropoulos stressed, however, that the letter was not
intended to question whether the Hunter Biden materials were authentic,
but rather to raise the possibility that the Russians were trying to
interfere in the presidential election by helping in some way to bring
the information to the attention of the press."
“We talk about how this is a
Russian information operation, it’s not disinformation,” he stated. “And
that’s an important nuance to me as a former intelligence officer. It
might not be for the rest of the public, or for people on the right, or
the left, or wherever, who would criticize the letter, but it is an
important nuance. Because we did not say it was Russian disinformation,
we said it was a Russian information operation.”
The letter by the former
intelligence leaders does not explicitly state that the Hunter Biden
story was Russian disinformation, but it talks about the Hunter Biden
story being a Russian information campaign and then goes into depth
about Russian disinformation. The letter was crafted in such a way to
imply that the Hunter Biden story was Russian disinformation and
therefore these intelligence leaders were saying the story was false.
The legacy media and big tech
repeatedly claimed that the letter stated that the Hunter Biden laptop
story was Russian disinformation. There is no reporting of the authors
of the letters or any of the signatories ever attempting to correct the
reporting by pointing out that they were only claiming that it was a
Russian information operation. None of the "journalists" reporting on
the story contacted any of the 50+ named intelligence leaders to clear
up the confusion...
The claim that intelligence
leaders claimed that this was Russian disinformation had a real effect.
Twitter locked the New York Post (5th largest newspaper in America) out
of their Twitter account for 16 days because they refused to delete
their article spreading "Russian Disinformation." Many of the social
media platforms censored the story or inhibited their users' ability to
spread the story. The network news refused to cover the story because it
was Russian disinformation. The blackout was so complete that polling
has shown that many Biden voters were unaware of the whole story or
aspects of the story including the FBI investigation.
The reason that the emails and
laptop could not be disavowed or called disinformation is that Hunter
Biden himself dropped off the laptop and did not return to pick it up,
so it became the property of the computer shop. The owner gave the
laptop to the FBI but made an image of the disk. He then provided a copy
of the disk to the Trump campaign. The emails on the laptop were from
Gmail so they contained a digital signature verifying their contents had
not changed and that they had been sent through Gmail to the
recipients.
This letter by these intelligence
officials was used by the media as justification for not covering the
story since it was Russian disinformation. The letter was reported many
times as claiming Russian disinformation and no one ever corrected that
mischaracterization.
The claim that this was a Russian
information operation is interesting since it implies that the
President of the United States and his allies do not have the ability to
spread a story about potential corruption by his opponent Joe Biden in
the US. The story of this corruption by one of two major candidates for
presidents could only be publicized with the help of Russians.
The former intelligence officers
knew that by calling it a Russian information operation and then talking
about Russian disinformation that the story would be reported as a
Russian disinformation operation since that is the term that has been
used to refer to the Clinton Emails. If the story was called Russian
disinformation then it could be censored by the media and Big Tech since
disinformation means it is false.
The leaders of the intelligence
community misleading the corporate media and public to prevent the
investigation of allegations of corruption against their preferred
candidate is what happens in failed totalitarian states, not healthy
democracies. The members of corporate media were not innocent bystanders
as they did not want to report this story and used the letter as a
means of ignoring the story. This was a disinformation campaign run
against the American people by intelligence leaders who are going to be
in power during the Biden administration. This is why the intelligence
leaders misleading the public through our willing media that the Hunter
Biden story was Russian disinformation is our lie of the year.