Sunday, April 12, 2026

Kasparov: The West should have done something when warning signals came from Russia

From the Dialog, Dec. 28, 2025:

"Kasparov explained what's "unique" about Russia's aggression against Ukraine: "It was supposed to be a signal..." 

Russian opposition leader Garry Kasparov recalled events of past years when Putin "hinted" at his aggressive plans. 

The attack on Ukraine is different from any other war in that essentially no one warned of their aggressive plans, said Garry Kasparov. On the other hand, long before this, Putin had publicly declared his intention to restore historical error and recreate the Soviet Union, but his words didn't alert anyone.  

Garry Kasparov discussed the unique features of the war in Ukraine in an interview for the YouTube channel "Free Russia Forum." 

"The 2014 annexation was completely unprepared. Moreover, in 2013, it looked like no one would touch the borders, so the unique thing was that it was completely unexpected. I understand that the Americans thought: we'll just sign the document and that's it, but that's what intelligence agencies are for, by the way, there are analysts, there are a huge number of experts. What could you expect from them if they missed the collapse of the Soviet Union?" the politician opined.

Kasparov then recalled the historical events leading up to the attack on Ukraine: "So, in 2005, on April 25, at a joint session of the Federation Council and the State Duma, Putin uttered the words he was looking for: 'The collapse of the Soviet Union is the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century.' This was supposed to be a signal to Bush. So that Bush would hear it, Putin would repeat it in Munich in 2007, looking at Bush and all those Western leaders. He also said that the West must take Russia's interests into account and, please, return NATO to its 1997 borders, that is, give us all of Eastern Europe under our sphere of influence. What could have been more straightforward? What have they done? They did nothing.""  

The aftermath of Trump stopping intelligence aid to Ukraine last year

From the Time:

""Hundreds of Dead": Inside the Fallout from Trump's Ukraine Intel Pause

The impact for the Ukrainians has been most acute in the Russian region of Kursk, where the Ukrainian armed forces are struggling to hold a swath of territory that they seized in a shock offensive last August. That assault marked the first foreign invasion of Russian land since World War II, humiliating the Kremlin and drawing thousands of North Korean troops into the war to help Russia regain control of the area.

President Zelensky sees that region as a critical source of leverage in any future peace talks with the Russians. His aim is to trade parts of the Kursk area for Ukrainian land that Russia has occupied. “We will swap one territory for another,” Zelensky told the Guardian last month.

Since the U.S. halted intelligence sharing, however, the Russians have made swift advances in Kursk, aiming to cut off Ukrainian supply lines into the region, according to military officers and fresh maps of the battlefield produced by Deep State, an open-source intelligence organization. “If we do nothing, there will be huge consequences,” the co-founder of Deep State, Roman Pogorily, told local media on Tuesday. The main supply line for Ukrainian troops operating in Kursk is now “under constant attack,” he added. “It is impossible to move normally along it.” 

A source in the Zelensky government confirmed that operations in the region of Kursk have been worst affected by the loss of access to U.S. intelligence. “Not only Kursk, in all Russian territory there are problems now,” he says. The Ukrainians have lost the ability to detect the approach of Russian bombers and other warplanes as they take off inside Russia. As a result, Ukraine has less time to warn civilians and military personnel about the risk of an approaching airstrike or missile. “It’s very dangerous for our people,” the government source says. “It has to be immediately changed.”

The loss of U.S. intelligence has also hurt the ability of Ukrainian forces to launch long- and intermediate-range strikes against Russian targets. Some of those strikes have been conducted in recent years using an American weapon known as the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, or HIMARS. When the U.S. first provided these weapons to Ukraine in 2022, it also began sending intelligence from U.S. satellites that allowed for precision strikes against Russian command centers far behind the front lines. “The satellites allow us to see what the enemy is hiding,” Oleksiy Reznikov, who was then Ukraine’s defense minister, said at the time. “The HIMARS allow us to destroy it.”

These capabilities have now been crippled without access to information from U.S. satellites. Even Maxar Technologies, a private space technology company headquartered in Colorado, has stopped sending Ukraine images from its satellites, according to two Ukrainian military officers familiar with the situation. Ukrainian forces have often used satellite images from Maxar to plan long-range strikes against Russia.

In an emailed statement to TIME on Friday, Maxar Technologies confirmed the disruption to service in Ukraine. “The U.S. government has decided to temporarily suspend Ukrainian accounts” in the system that the government uses to provide access to commercial satellite imagery. “Maxar has contracts with the U.S. government and dozens of allied and partner nations around the world to provide satellite imagery and other geospatial data,” it said. “Each customer makes their own decisions on how they use and share that data.”

Adding to the Ukrainian sense of abandonment, the group of Western “partners” who helped receive and process satellite intelligence at the military headquarters in Kyiv have departed, says the source close to Ukraine’s general staff. “There’s no one left,” he says, declining to be more specific in identifying what “partners” he meant.

Some European intelligence agencies have rushed to help fill the gap left by the Trump Administration. But it will take time for them to deploy, and they are not likely to make up for U.S. intelligence capabilities any time soon, two of the Ukrainian officers say. “We are really thankful to European partners,” one of them says. “This is the only one solid point that gives us any hope, because without this support, we cannot survive.”"


Trump berates the sacrifice of Americans who died for Ukraine

From the Daily Beast / Facebook:"

"Trump, 79, Sends Jaw-Dropping Message to Families of Fallen U.S. Fighters
 
Janna Brancolini, Daily Beast
 
President Donald Trump struggled to offer much sympathy for the families of about 100 Americans—many of them U.S. military veterans—who have died fighting in Ukraine.
 
An estimated several thousand Americans have volunteered to fight for Ukraine since Russian dictator Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion in 2022, with at least 92 Americans killed as of September, The New York Times reported.
 
Following a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago on Sunday to discuss a peace deal to end the war, Trump was asked about his message to the families of the fallen Americans.
 
“The message is so obvious,” he replied. “What a shame. They died in a foreign country. And some are celebrated people, they’re very celebrated. But it’s so sad that a thing like that would happen.”
He then immediately moved on to the next question.
 
Social media users quickly noted that the president hadn’t thanked the fallen for their sacrifice, praised their commitment to freedom and democracy, or even offered his personal condolences.
 
Many of the Americans who have died in Ukraine were U.S. military veterans.
 
Mike Meoli, 71, was a retired Navy Seal and firefighter who traveled to Ukraine to train medics on the front lines. He was killed in November 2024, ABC 10 News San Diego reported.
 
Nicholas Maimer, 45, was an Army Special Forces veteran and Idaho native who helped train Ukrainian officers. He was killed in May 2023 in an artillery barrage, according to Military.com.
 
Ian Frank Tortorici, 32, was a retired corporal with the U.S. Marines who fought on the front lines. He died in July 2023 after a Russian missile hit a restaurant where he was eating while on leave, Task and Purpose reported.
 
The U.S. government has declined to provide aid to American fighters to avoid any suggestion of a direct clash with Russia, which is a nuclear power, the Times reported in September.
 
But some social media users argued that Trump’s barely-there compassion for their families wasn’t measured diplomacy—it was reminiscent of the president’s previous comments about Americans who died in combat being “suckers” and “losers.”
 
During a trip to France in 2018, the president said American soldiers who died on French soil during World War I were “losers,” and that U.S. Marines who helped halt the 1918 German advance toward Paris were “suckers” for dying at the hands of the enemy.
 
The White House denied reports of the comments, which were revealed by The Atlantic magazine in 2020, but they’re just one example of the president disparaging military veterans and their families.
 
He has mocked the late Sen. John McCain’s war injuries, publicly insulted the parents of a 27-year-old soldier who died in a car bombing in Iraq, and privately raged about the funeral costs for a female soldier who was murdered by a male soldier at Fort Hood.
 
Although he failed to offer much comfort Sunday to the families of Americans who have died fighting Russia, Trump did manage to heap praise on the man who started the war.
 
“Russia wants to see Ukraine succeed,” Trump said, prompting Zelensky to raise an eyebrow. “I was explaining to the president [Zelensky], President Putin was very generous in his feeling toward Ukraine succeeding.”
 
He also said he “understands” Putin’s refusal to agree to a ceasefire while a longer-term agreement is being hashed out.
 
“He feels that look, you know, they’re fighting and to stop, and if they have to start again, which is a possibility, he doesn’t want to be in that position—I understand that position,” Trump said.
 
Putin bombarded Ukraine with over 100 drones on Christmas Eve and early Christmas Day, killing at least seven civilians.
 
Sunday’s talks were intended to address security guarantees and possible territorial concessions, and while both sides said progress had been made, neither gave any indication that a deal was within reach.
 
The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for comment."

Trump insults the intelligence of his audience again: "Russia wants to see Ukraine succeed"

From NPR:

"Trump says Ukraine and Russia 'closer than ever' to peace after talks with Zelenskyy

PALM BEACH, Florida — President Donald Trump on Sunday insisted Ukraine and Russia are "closer than ever before" to a peace deal as he hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at his Florida resort... 

The president's statements came after the two leaders met for a discussion that took place after what Trump described as an "excellent," two-and-a-half-hour phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose invasion of Ukraine launched the war four years ago. Trump insisted he believed Putin still wants peace, even as Russia launched another round of attacks on Ukraine while Zelenskyy flew to the United States for the latest round of negotiations.

"Russia wants to see Ukraine succeed," Trump said during a late afternoon news conference following a meeting with Zelenskyy..."

More from Ukrainska Pravda:

"Trump says Putin claims he "wants to see Ukraine succeed"

Ulyana Krychkovska — 29 December 2025
 

US President Donald Trump has said that Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin has claimed he "wants to see Ukraine succeed" and would help with its reconstruction.

Source: Trump at a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy... as reported by European Pravda

Details: Trump was asked whether, during his conversation with the Kremlin leader, they had discussed Russia's responsibility for any reconstruction of Ukraine after a potential peace deal.

Quote: "They're going to be helping. Russia's going to be helping. Russia wants to see Ukraine succeed, once... It sounds a little strange, but I was explaining to the president."

Details: Trump added that "Putin was very generous in his feeling towards Ukraine succeeding, including supplying energy, electricity and other things at very low prices".

"So, a lot of good things came out of that call today," he noted."

***

Some comments cited by Mediaite / Yahoo!News

"

“What a complete embarrassment,” wrote political commentator @ArmandoNDK.

“Sauron wants to see Frodo succeed,” posted analyst @OAlexanderDK in a nod to the bad guy/good guy trope in JRR Tolkein’s The Lord of The Rings.

Author Michael Weiss wrote of Zelensky, “He can’t believe he’s up there deciding the fate of millions with a hebephrenic pit boss. And not for the first or last time.”

The Bulwark’s Sarah Longwell wrote, “Whenever I truly want my neighbor to succeed, I break into his house, brutalize his family, steal his children, and burn his house to the ground while screaming, ‘bro, I’m just trying to help!’”

Longwell added, “Our president is an international calamity.”

Ukrainian commentator @BohuslavskaKate wrote, “About the press conference: Trump is absolutely detached from reality. He doesn’t understand how to end this war or what he is doing. But he visibly enjoys bragging about his relationship with Putin and their sweet phone calls in front of [Zelensky]. To him, it’s a kind of power flex, but in reality he is simply admiring a war criminal in front of the president of the victim nation. It doesn’t looks powerful, it looks sadistic and dumb.”

"This is an absolutely unhinged thing to say about a country that was invaded, bombed, and terrorized by Russia. Calling Putin “generous” while Ukraine is fighting for its survival tells you everything about where Trump’s loyalties actually lie."" 

***

Needless to say, more than 3 months later, the war is still raging with no end in sight.

Republican congressman cannot say whether Trump supports Ukraine or Russia

From Mediaite / Yahoo!News:

"‘Which Side is Trump On?’ GOP Congressman Spins His Wheels When Asked if President Supports Russia or Ukraine

Joe DePaolo

A Republican congressman spun his wheels Sunday morning when asked whether President Donald Trump is on Russia’s side or Ukraine’s side in the war between the two.

In an interview on ABC’s This Week, Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) made clear which side he believes the United States should be on — but was less clear about where he believes Trump stands.

“America, when we address the issue of whose side we’re on, you can’t be America first and be pro-Russia,” Turner said. “Russia is a self-declared adversary of the United States, and here they are mercilessly killing Ukrainians and trying to take Ukrainian land.”... 

ABC’s Jonathan Karl then asked what seemed like a simple question.

“Which side is Trump on?” Karl asked

But the congressman sputtered.

“I…you know, clearly… you know, Trump is on the side of peace,” Turner replied. “And he’s trying to balance these two forces — which is very, very difficult to bring these two parties together.”

Karl quickly followed up.

“Trump has repeatedly said that Ukraine never should have started this war or words to that effect,” he said. “I mean, Ukraine didn’t start this war! They were invaded. So, how does that affect his effort to try to broker a peace deal?” 

Turner agreed with the premise that Russia did indeed start the war, but danced around the question from Karl.

“Clearly, it’s a war of aggression is started by Russia — and it has been started by Russia,” Turner said. “And I think that Trump’s sense of wanting peace is incredibly important, and I think it’s a noble goal. And I think we’re getting closer. I think that Zelensky is coming with a plan that is workable and that could get us there. And hopefully, with our allies in Europe that have come together — which, they seem to be working and advancing the type of security assurances we’re going to need with the United States, that hopefully, we can deter Russia in the future.”

Watch above, via ABC."

Russia bombed civilians during the winter holidays while Trump's minions claim it is committed to peace

From the Daily Beast / Yahoo!News:

"Putin Humiliates Trump With Kyiv Strike on Eve of Peace Talks

Adam Downer

Russia doesn’t seem to agree with U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff’s assessment that the country is “fully committed” to achieving peace with Ukraine.

Russian forces bombed Kyiv on Saturday morning, killing one person and injuring dozens more, less than one week after Witkoff boasted of Russia’s so-called “commitment” on social media.

“Russia remains fully committed to achieving peace in Ukraine. Russia highly values the efforts and support of the United States to resolve the Ukrainian conflict and re-establish global security,” Witkoff wrote on Dec. 21.

On Dec. 27, the Russian Defense Ministry bragged that it carried out a “massive strike” on Ukraine, saying it used “long-range precision-guided weapons from land, air, and sea, including Kinzhal hypersonic aeroballistic missiles” to attack “Ukrainian military-industrial complex enterprises.”

The 10-hour bombardment comes one day before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, 47, is set to meet with Donald Trump,79, in Florida to discuss his peace proposal to end the Russia-Ukraine war.

Zelensky said the attack typified Russia’s attitude toward peace.

“Where is the Russian response to the proposals to end the war, which were made by the United States and the world?” he said on Telegram, adding, “Russian representatives hold long talks. In reality, the ‘Kinzhal’ and ‘Shaheds’ speak for them.” “Kinzhal” and “Shahed” are the missiles and drones used in the attack.

The attack ramps up the pressure on Sunday’s meeting. President Trump has seemingly grown tired of the ongoing war, but has blamed the drawn-out nature of the conflict on Ukraine and its allies in Europe, rather than Russia...

Trump didn’t seem eager to sign off on Zelensky’s proposal in a conversation with Politico on Friday, saying of Zelensky, “He doesn’t have anything until I approve it, so we’ll see what he’s got.”

He added, “I think it’s going to go good with him. I think it’s going to go good with Putin.”"

Putin openly declares disinterest in peace talks, which he never used to do in Biden's time

From the To Be Or blog, Dec 27, 2025 (hattip: Dialog):

"Putin: "Judging by the pace we're seeing at the front line, our interest in withdrawing Ukrainian military units from the territories they currently occupy is essentially zero. For a variety of reasons. And if the Kyiv authorities don't want to resolve the matter peacefully, we will resolve all the tasks facing us during the special military operation by force of arms." 

 __ 

Wow. That's right. 

I interpret this as "if you don't leave now, we might as well abandon the negotiations altogether because we're moving so fast that we're not interested." 
 
A new ultimatum to Ukraine. 
 
Like, Zelenskyy, get out of the "territories you occupy" (which ones, by the way?), otherwise even Trump won't force me to sit down at the table. Like, this is your last chance. 
 
The only thing is, I'm not sure he can afford to walk out of the negotiations right now, because there's still the risk of incurring Trump's wrath. But as an additional pressure before tomorrow's meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump—yes, it absolutely goes.

But for now, even without the successes he boasts of, he is so confident in the irreversibility of his victory that he allows himself to doubt the very need to participate in peace negotiations, despite the fact that he has never actually participated in them - he only pretended to."

Saturday, April 11, 2026

Nevzorov: Cannibalism is a principle of Russian politics

From Faktor, Dec 28, 2025 - Russian opposition journalist Alexander Nevzorov, now in Ukraine:

"...It is no secret that the best New Year's gift for the world under the Christmas tree would be a coffin with the body of the Russian Fuhrer. Simply because of the number of problems that would be solved at once with this coffin. His sudden or not so sudden death would be guaranteed to save the planet from a mass of problems and possible large-scale disasters. 

What would Putin's death change? A lot. Because even in the Kremlin's snake pit, where everyone presents themselves as frostbitten fanatics, there is no one who can compare with Putin in mania and cannibalism. All this entourage of his, even the most hysterical and bloody, are cardboard characters who will melt like smoke at the moment of his death. None of them is capable of continuing this infernal game, nor of taking it over. 

 Yes, Putin is undoubtedly what he is by all parameters - both medical and scientific - but his Nazguls are even more insignificant than their master. Of course, Putin's death will not solve the age-old problems of cannibalism as a fundamental principle of Russian politics. But nevertheless, the planet will still get a brief but valuable breath of air."

Russian oppositionary: If you have nuclear weapons, war brings dividends

From the Dialog, Dec 27, 2025:

"Gudkov explained how and when Ukraine will be able to retake the occupied territories: "The war won't end here" 

Russian opposition leader Gennady Gudkov offered a disappointing forecast for the war's end. 

Putin has no intention of stopping, so hoping for a ceasefire is pointless, said Gennady Gudkov. The Kremlin not only plans to continue fighting in Ukraine but also to attack other countries in the near future. Therefore, it can be concluded that Ukraine's most important priority now is to hold out, maintain control over its territories, and wait for a regime change in Russia.  

The former Russian State Duma deputy voiced his forecast for the war in Ukraine on the YouTube channel "And Graham Crashed." 

A Russian opposition figure outlined possible scenarios for the war's end: "Everything that's happening makes the outcome of the war disappointing. Although, of course, if Ukraine manages to defend its territories and not give in to Russia's capitulation demands, then this gives Ukraine a chance to become a European country, and it will regain the remaining territories through diplomatic and political means. But this will happen after a considerable period of time, when the Putin regime collapses. Given the war's undoubted disadvantage for Ukraine, it [i.e. Putin's regime] will receive an adrenaline rush and will seek a new way to wage war, since it turns out that war, with nuclear weapons, brings such dividends."..."

Hristo Grozev: The most important thing in the Epstein files is not the sexual aspect but the Russian connection

From Faktor, the original source is an interview to UA news:

"Hristo Grozev: Trump's feeling that Russian intelligence services know everything Epstein knew is enough

December 27, 2025 

— Hristo, do you believe that the Russian intelligence services were able to obtain compromising information against Trump precisely because of the case against Jeffrey Epstein? 

This is not necessarily the kind of compromising evidence that everyone has been thinking about for years. Some hope, others fear, that such compromising evidence will not emerge — namely, of a sexual nature. But what we see from the correspondence published yesterday speaks of something else. That Jeffrey Epstein himself offered his services to Russian intelligence, to the Russian state, so that they could better profile, create a psychological profile of Trump himself and understand what his weak points were as a personality, how to negotiate with him in a way that they could win. 

There are no specific references to compromising sexual material. But this, of course, is an extremely interesting topic, because it raises the question of why a person who was a billionaire, who had his own island and his own airline, who was involved in sex trafficking, including underage girls, wanted to communicate and under what circumstances did this communication take place with the Russian services? 

He himself claims in their letters that he met with a representative of Russia - with the then ambassador Churkin, who died in 2017. He was a key person who actually helped Trump gain legitimacy as an international factor even before he won the 2016 election. So the question arises - what was the topic of this communication? 

To me, this is obvious because Russian intelligence has always understood that there are rich people, wealthy people from the West, who, if we look at their motivation through Maslow's pyramid, have already accumulated more than enough money for several lifetimes. They consider themselves successful, but they need something more, something different - to be factors in the international, geopolitical plan. They have certain unfulfilled dreams that are not related to money. And this is neither the first nor the only case. 

 Jeffrey Epstein.... There have been such cases before - with Robert Maxwell in the UK. Or rather, a story that is close to me, because it also affected my life - the story of the German-Austrian businessman and former billionaire Jan Marsalek, who is now hiding in Moscow. 

The story of Epstein and Marsalek is quite similar, because both of them had a huge amount of compromising material — personal compromising material and knowledge of the psychological profiles of influential figures. Epstein — mainly on American political figures, including Trump, and Marsalek — on German and Austrian ones. And they openly traded this with the Russian special services in order to gain importance, recognition — to be perceived as “super spies,” as people who communicate with major countries and are a factor in geopolitical terms.

— Hristo, how do you think this compromising material is used at all, if it was actually obtained from Epstein or through Epstein by the Russian intelligence services? In what case could it go public and what would that look like? 

Compromising material of this nature only works when it is not made public. Imagine that Trump understood — and he certainly understood — that Epstein is a person who knows specific cases of sexual crimes that are also mentioned in other conversations. That Trump had meetings with girls, often possibly underage, and others not — but the very fact that Trump knows that Epstein knows it, and that Trump knows that Epstein communicated with representatives of the Russian government — this fact in itself will forever influence and shape Trump's behavior. 

After that, there is no need to publish anything anymore. And it should never be published. Because the feeling of caution, the feeling that the Russian intelligence services know everything that Epstein knows because they communicated with him — that is more than enough. 

So once again — and yesterday I was answering many questions from other journalists — what exactly the compromising material is is not that important. The mere feeling that "they know everything" is quite enough and should never come to light.  

— Is such compromising material often used in political negotiations — behind the scenes or between intelligence agencies? And how often is it reminded that one side has compromising material against the other? 
 
It doesn’t even need to be reminded. Sometimes it is done, but the very fact of understanding that such compromising material can exist — even without a precise definition of what it is — is more than enough. 
 
In the case of Jan Marsalek, whom I mentioned, he claims to have compromising material of a sexual nature against German politicians. And, of course, such hints — if they reached me, they certainly reached these politicians as well. And they will forever be much more attentive to the state that possesses such information. In this case, the German state will not insist on Marsalek’s return to Germany, because they are afraid that he might actually publish this compromising material...
 
— What do you think — is Putin afraid of the publication of compromising information against him, or has he already learned to deny everything? Because we see how many investigations have been conducted into corruption in Russia, into the rule of Vladimir Putin and his entourage. He always prefers to ignore them. How dangerous is this compromising information for the Russian government? 
 
I do not agree that he ignores it. He does it publicly, and then sends his poisoners and murderers. I mean that publicly, inside Russia, in front of Russian citizens, he prefers not to notice it. But it is clear that the repressive machine is working at full speed. 
 
It is important to understand that if the repressive machine is working, it means that it is affecting him. It is affecting him and he is afraid. His public behavior differs from what he is actually doing behind the scenes. 
 
After the war began, after the full-scale invasion, he began to care less about it. I recently read chats that became part of a criminal case against spies who were following me and Roman Dobrokhotov. In them, FSB representatives directly discuss that after the start of the war in 2022, they no longer care how they look abroad. The reputational cost that existed before has completely disappeared. 
 
Therefore, I can say that after the start of the war, they care much less about their public image and, accordingly, they are ready for much more terrible actions than before."

The USA should not mislead Ukraine with Article 5-like "guarantees"

From UNIAN:

"The US should abandon Article 5 guarantees to Ukraine, according to the Washington Post 

Yaroslav Konoshchuk, December 27, 2025 

The US proposal to provide Ukraine with security guarantees similar to NATO's Article 5, meaning entering into war with Russia in the event of further aggression, is potentially dangerous and empty. 

This opinion was expressed in a column for the Washington Post by Samuel Charap, professor of Russian and Eurasian politics at the Rand Institute, and Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities. 

The authors noted that the US has so far refused to send American troops to Ukraine, and there are reasons for this. 

"If it were necessary to deploy American troops to Ukraine to protect vital U.S. interests, they would have been there long ago," the authors noted. 

Proponents of expanding security guarantees for Ukraine along the lines of Article 5 argue that the lack of treaty obligations is what deters the U.S. government from deploying troops, but historical evidence suggests otherwise. 

"The United States has never hesitated to deploy its military forces abroad," the authors noted, emphasizing that the U.S. reluctance to fight for Ukraine impacts any future commitment to do so...

"Ukraine will need security guarantees under any agreement that ends the war. But the Trump administration should prioritize narrow but credible commitments—more like what the US and its allies have been willing to do for Ukraine over the past four years—over broad commitments that appear generous but are ultimately empty and potentially dangerous," the authors concluded."

***

If Ukraine had been given only such "narrow but credible commitments" in 1994, I don't think it would have surrendered its nuclear arsenal.  

Security expert: For Trump, Ukraine is an obstacle

From 112.ua, Dec. 12, 2025:

"Zelensky to Meet Trump at Mar-a-Lago: What the Leaders Will Discuss

Peter Neumann, a security expert, expresses doubts about the possibility of a breakthrough for Kyiv, as he believes Trump’s geopolitical priorities lie elsewhere.

"For Trump, Ukraine is rather an obstacle to normalizing relations with Russia, which is his main geopolitical interest," Neumann stated.

He believes that a success will be if Zelensky can convince Trump of Ukraine's readiness for compromises."

 

 

What's wrong with US-proposed "peace plans"

From an interview of Ukrainian diplomat Oleh Shamshur in the Obozrevatel:

"The amended plan, slapped with spaghetti on the Ukrainians' ears, remained a reward for Putin. Why a personal meeting between Zelensky and Trump won't change anything

27.12.2025  

For the first time, the Ukrainian President has officially announced 20 points of the so-called peace plan. Some observers believe this is a definite positive shift for Ukraine, given what we started with several weeks ago. Others, however, say that the statement that, theoretically, we could somehow retain control of the part of Donbas is essentially a reduction in our "red lines." What do you think we have today?

Looking at the philosophy of this document, there are two key points. First, it's a process of "improving on a bad thing." That is, if we look at what has become known and what has been approved by the president, we see that there have indeed been some changes, and some formulations have disappeared. In particular, it's striking that the detailed plan for building a "beautiful future" between the US and Russia—with its economic and political reintegration—has disappeared. But we understand perfectly well that this will in no way prevent such scenarios from being implemented bilaterally. And Ukraine doesn't need any consent for this, not even formal.  

Secondly, the document's philosophy from the very beginning, ever since Trump's initiatives emerged and were first discussed, has been a plan to reward Russia for its aggression. And, accordingly, this entails a series of extremely painful, existential concessions on Ukraine's part. In this sense, nothing has changed. And, unfortunately, it is precisely on this basis that the United States is prepared to negotiate. And, in fact, the Europeans also agree with this, despite occasional statements to the contrary.

Even if we imagine the best-case scenario, a hypothetical "freeze"—and right now it looks like a freeze of the situation on the demarcation line—this would amount to a territorial division of Ukraine with very dim prospects for a return...

Regarding security guarantees, the Ukrainian President and the head of the negotiating team, Rustem Umerov, have been making some fairly positive statements lately. They say the Americans understand us, are accommodating, and perhaps something will even be approved by Congress. But what do we actually have, it's hard to understand, other than the fact that the first shot from Ukraine destroys all guarantees?

For this document to have any value, it needed to clearly spell out the guarantees. Previously, the logic was that partners would provide Ukraine with security guarantees, or at least discuss them. Now it turns out that these guarantees must also be approved by Russia. And even as they are currently written, they are not spelled out at all...

The document's overall philosophy only heightens doubts about the United States' readiness to assume a genuine leadership role in Ukraine's defense, despite all the US President's statements. If all of this is once again made contingent on Russia's consent, this, firstly, opens the door for Russia to torpedo both the agreement itself and the ceasefire.

Let's be frank: we need a ceasefire. What kind of "territorial agreement" could there possibly be with the Russians? It's absurd. So yes, I have serious reservations about the philosophy of this document, especially about the security guarantees. They must be concrete and backed by commitments from the US and Europeans now – before or alongside the signing of any agreements. If that doesn't happen, everything will again boil down to "assurances." And we already know what these "assurances" look like. It's the same old "spaghetti on the ears."  

It looks like Trump and his representatives need the war to end as soon as possible. And what happens next, in a few months, seems to be of no interest to them at all.

This is essentially Trump's method. He needs to end the war, report to the world, and most importantly, to his own electorate, that "the job is done." If you look at all his previous mediation initiatives in other conflicts, the logic is the same. The ceasefire lasts a few days, and then problems arise that were clear from the start. After that, he'll tell everyone that he's already helped conclude nine agreements, and he'll once again demand the Nobel Peace Prize. It sounds ridiculous, but for Trump, this is truly an extremely important issue. This is precisely why Witkoff and Kushner were brought in at this stage: to push through this deal, to push through the way their boss, Donald Trump, sees it...

We can discuss individual points as much as we want now, but the entire structure, thanks to Trump, is designed in such a way that everything depends on Russia's consent. And Moscow has already said: yes, we are ready to work with this document, but only as a basis for starting negotiations.

Until Russia is stopped through concerted efforts—sanctions, weapons, and pressure—Putin will try to dictate his will and his vision of the agreements. A ceasefire will only be possible under conditions acceptable to him. Incidentally, this must be discussed frankly with the public. Instead of talking about some kind of "progress," "consensus," or "if it's not good, it's not so bad." We must state frankly: under any circumstances, this scenario is bad for Ukraine. And everyone must prepare for a future continuation of the war. Avoid saying this just because Trump or his envoys might dislike it; this is the very issue of real sovereignty that is so pompously outlined in the first paragraph of the document..."

Wednesday, April 08, 2026

The USA wants to use an occupied Ukrainian nuclear power plant together with Russia

From the Street / Yahoo!News:

"U.S. reportedly seeks crypto mining access to Russia-occupied nuclear site

Russian President Vladimir Putin said the United States has expressed interest in establishing cryptocurrency mining operations at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP).

The statement came during a recent meeting between Putin and Russian business leaders, where he discussed ongoing negotiations over the plant’s future, according to a report from Russian outlet Kommersant on Dec. 25.

Located in southeastern Ukraine, the ZNPP is Europe’s largest nuclear facility and once played a central role in Ukraine’s electricity supply and grid stability. Since being occupied by Russian forces in 2022, the site has become a recurring flashpoint in diplomatic discussions.

The report claims that Washington aims to use a proposed stake in the ZNPP for crypto mining as part of wider U.S.-Russia talks. Moscow and Washington are reportedly discussing a joint management plan for the plant that would exclude Ukraine.

However, according to the BBC, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky presented an updated peace plan, which included a proposal from the U.S. for a tripartite arrangement for the facility. In the arrangement, Russia, Ukraine, and the U.S. will hold equal stakes in the facility.

Control over the ZNPP has major geopolitical and security implications, as whoever manages the plant effectively controls a key source of electricity for southern Ukraine and a stabilizing component of the wider regional grid..."

Saturday, April 04, 2026

Cartoon about Russian psyche


 The pig in the mud is saying, "Traitor...".

(Source

 

Russia and the USA pressure Ukraine together to cede land so that they would guarantee its territorial integrity once again

Ukrainian diplomat Valeriy Chaly in a Dec 27, 2025 interview to the Obozrevatel:

"Putin has a strong desire to demonstrate aggression. And, in my opinion, we see all the signs that China supports this intention to demonstrate Europe's weakness and subordination. 

This now coincides with the Trump administration's desires: to subjugate the Europeans, to make them more "comfortable." The goal is to dominate trade issues in order to gain an advantage in these negotiations. 

Things are shaping up so that China and America are at the table, and Russia wants to join them, although it has no other reason than two factors: nuclear weapons and the war in Ukraine. For Putin, war is a tool for maintaining his power in Russia and bargaining on the geopolitical stage; he still hopes to gain a foothold there. Furthermore, he's trying to keep the empire from completely disintegrating. I believe the collapse of the Soviet empire is still underway. The Soviet Union hasn't quite collapsed yet. There are still many republics in Russia that are looking for an exit, having failed to do so in 1991...

It is important that Ukrainian negotiators do not make the mistakes of Budapest, according to which nuclear disarmament actually took place. 

The first point [in the current negotiations] was a ceasefire. That was Trump's position, and he pressured Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said it wasn't acceptable. Then we agreed. [Then Putin didn't want.]  "While you're busy implementing peace agreements in parliament, I'll be fighting," says Russia. "And the longer you delay, the more I'll destroy you."

Now Russia and the United States are putting pressure on us together. For what purpose? So that we'll trade our unoccupied territories for guarantees of territorial integrity. It's no surprise that the countries that guaranteed Ukrainian territorial integrity are now forcing Ukraine to give up more territory in order to guarantee its territorial integrity again. This is nonsense... 

This is a manifestation of the weakness of Ukraine's negotiating position, and they are pressuring us in the same way as they did to achieve Ukraine's nuclear disarmament: the US is acting together with Russia...

The American president says he's ready to provide a security guarantee at the level of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. That's one sentence. The second sentence: I'm against your membership in NATO... The third sentence: I want European countries to take responsibility for Ukraine and pay for it. Where's the logic? If you want security for Ukraine, why can't Ukraine immediately be a member of the Alliance, and America not take on some of the responsibility? There's no logic, it doesn't add up. And why? One of the statements is wrong. Which one? I think it's that America is ready to provide security guarantees. 

The current negotiating track is a false start. Especially since we're now, it seems to me, at almost the highest point of escalation in the war on the ground: Ukraine is at its lowest point since 2022, and Russia is at its highest. Smart people don't negotiate under these conditions, and we're being pressured. However, there will be a window of opportunity, and it will open next year, when Ukraine's position will be stronger than it is today."

Released Israeli hostage tells horror stories about Palestinian rapists and murderers

From Novaya Gazeta Europe:

"Eli's Second Life 

The story of an Israeli hostage who, on the day of his return from captivity, learned that his family had been murdered, survived hell, but found the strength to move on. 

December 25, 2025 Mira Livadina 

2025 was a difficult year for Israel. But still, it was a big positive. The war ended. The remaining hostages were returned alive. The bodies of almost all those killed were returned. Behind each return were human destinies, unfulfilled plans and dreams. And often, upon returning, the survivors learned the most terrible thing—that their families were no longer there. This happened to Yarden Bibas, the father of the little redheads. This happened to Eli Sharabi, who at first couldn't understand why his wife and two daughters didn't meet him from captivity. This happened to dozens of others. People who had survived two years in the tunnels of Gaza, hoping to be reunited with their loved ones, found themselves in an abyss—with all meaning completely lost. And this is the tragedy that Israel is left alone to face. 

But even amidst immense grief and an ocean of despair, life cautiously triumphs over death. Not immediately—over time, through pain and emptiness. It brings miracles and hope, seemingly lost forever. "The melancholy grows stronger," wrote Elie Sharabi. "However, since my release, I choose every morning filled with life, action, and hope. We have suffered enough; we deserve a different reality. We want to begin healing."

The New Year is the perfect time to tell a story of renewed hope. This is the story of Eli Sharabi, who was able to start a new life. 

"There are no children left in Be'eri..." 

 The action takes place on Kibbutz Be'eri in southern Israel, a model of the Soviet collective farms. It was founded by young Jewish workers in 1946, two years before Israel declared independence. All the wars with its neighbors ricocheted on the small kibbutz. Be'eri, although suffering from frequent gunfire, survived. This continued for almost 80 years—until October 7, 2023.  

At that time, the kibbutz had a population of just over a thousand. On October 7, more than a hundred people—one in nine residents—were brutally murdered in Be'eri. Women and men, the elderly and children, infants. 

After the Be'eri massacre and the subsequent accusations of starting the war in Gaza, a sad phrase spread throughout Israel: "There's no water to wash children in Gaza. And in Be'eri, there are no more children to wash." 

Eli Sharabi arrived at Kibbutz Be'eri at the age of 14, in 1986. He was born in Tel Aviv, to Jews returned from Yemen and Morocco. But when he became a teenager, his parents decided to send him and his older brother, Yossi, to study at the kibbutz, which also provided them with housing and food... 

In Be'eri, Eli finished school and went into the army. After serving, he returned to the kibbutz. It was there, in 1995, that he met the love of his life. Her name was Lian Brisley, a beautiful 20-year-old British volunteer who had come to the kibbutz with a large group of young people from England. They fell in love instantly. After five years of an emotionally charged, on-again, off-again relationship, they married in the bride's hometown of Bristol, England. But the newlyweds decided to live in Be'eri, the town that had brought them together. There, in the following years, the couple had two daughters: Noya (in 2007) and Yael (in 2010).

After the army, Eli earned a first and then a second degree in economics from Be'er Sheva University. He achieved success on the kibbutz: first as treasurer, then as manager of the entire kibbutz economy. The girls grew up and went to school. Eli and his wife worked, traveled the world, celebrated holidays with the entire kibbutz, thought about their daughters' future education, and made plans. This was life before.

Arabic Lessons 
 
At 6:29 a.m. on October 7, 2023, it shattered into pieces. Eli's family, like everyone else in the country, heard an alarm, followed by the sound of rockets. News of terrorists infiltrating the country spread instantly. Panic, confusion over the scale of the incident, the lack of details, and most importantly, the absence of an army, caused panic among residents of border kibbutzim and towns. The Sharabis decided not to resist or hide in a secure room. Around 10 a.m., about a dozen Hamas militants burst into their home. Lian showed the terrorists her British passport, hoping that her British citizenship would save her and her children. The militants grabbed her husband and took him away. 
 
Eli remembered the last look his girls gave him as he was led away—their eyes were filled with terror. He only managed to shout to his wife and daughters: "No matter what they do to me, I'll come back!" For some reason, he was certain the women wouldn't be touched. That Hamas only wanted men. But Eli would only learn all the details two years later.
 
As soon as the car carrying Eli and the other hostages drove away, the terrorists shot 48-year-old Lian, 13-year-old Yael, and 16-year-old Noya right there in their home. The British passport Lian showed the terrorists was of no help. 
 
Eli's brother, Yossi Sharabi, was also taken to Gaza. He would be killed in captivity. But Eli would only learn of this two years later. The brothers were kept separate and were given no news. 

As Eli Sharabi was being transported to Gaza, he heard a Hamas battalion commander say over the radio: no more Israeli women and children were to be brought into the Strip; they had no vehicles left to transport them, no places to hold them. Only men under 40 were to be taken. The rest were to be killed on sight.

He remembers how, upon arriving in Gaza, he and other Be'eri residents were led blindfolded to a mosque. Then they removed the blindfolds, forced them to strip down to their underwear, and one of the militants began interrogating them in Arabic. A specially hired man was assigned to translate the hostages' questions into Hebrew. When Eli began answering in Arabic, the terrorists hesitated. They suspected he was an Israeli counterintelligence agent. No, he wasn't. He was from a kibbutz on the southern border, where many had been friends for years with Arabs from neighboring Arab villages. His eldest daughter, Noya, was learning Arabic in school, and Eli often had to help her with her homework.

Eli Sharabi was one of the few hostages who understood what his captors were saying to each other. Sometimes, they weren't even aware that they were being understood. In his book, "Hostage," Sharabi recounts these everyday conversations: how they wanted to wipe Israel and all Jews off the face of the earth. Eli recalled that the militants would often play videos of the October 7 killings on television and proudly tell each other how many Jews each of them had killed and how many women and children they had raped..."