Thursday, February 12, 2026

If Ukraine signs a bad deal, Russia can use this despite not signing the deal herself

From the Dialog, Nov 24, 2025:

"Nacke explained why Putin won't sign a peace plan, even if it comes from Russia: "There's one thing..." 

Political scientist Michael Nacke warned Ukraine against rashly signing a peace agreement with Russia

Putin doesn't need peace now, and the American plan could be an attempt to pressure Ukraine, Michael Nacke suggested. The Kremlin will refuse to sign a peace agreement, even if it was drafted and "dictated" to the Americans, because they are pursuing a completely different goal. 

Michael Nacke expressed his understanding of what is happening on YouTube. 

A popular blogger explained what's really happening now: "There's only one exceptional circumstance. It's that Russia has no intention of signing any plan, even if it includes the clause about withdrawing from Donbas. The plan proposed by Dmitriev and the American administration, despite being pro-Russian, is still completely humiliating and unacceptable to Putin, and, it seems to me, its only goal is to get Ukraine to reject it and for Trump to begin pressuring Kyiv by lifting sanctions against Russia and halting arms supplies to Ukraine."

"From this perspective, accepting this plan, even with its unacceptable clause, may be strategically justified. However, this is a risk, because, for example, in a year or less, when Putin has exhausted his resources and is ready to truly negotiate peace, he will refer to this plan and say, 'Well, there you go. You promised.' How to get out of this situation then is completely unclear." 

Piontkovsky: Trump unleashed his pro-Russian attack dogs on Zelensky to push the peace plan, clumsily translated from Russian

From the Faktor, Nov 24, 2025 - excerpts from Roman Tsimbalyuk's interview with Andrey Piontkovsky:

"Andrei Andreevich, please explain to us what is going on. Some plan appeared, then there were 28 points. Then it turned out that it was supposedly Trump's plan, then not quite Trump's, then negotiations in Geneva, and, strictly speaking, what will be presented at the negotiations with the Russians will most likely be rejected by them. Moreover, Putin rejected even these 28 points. He said something like: "Well, let's work with this." But essentially a huge amount of diplomatic — or pseudo-diplomatic — moves. Does this affect the development of events at all? In terms of pacifying the Russian Nazis?

There have been many such events in the last two or three days. I will, perhaps, begin with the conclusions that seem indisputable to me today. 

First conclusion. Ukraine will never, under any circumstances, agree to the demand to surrender the Donbass along with the fortifications of the Slavyansk-Kramator agglomeration without a fight. This is the first conclusion. 

And the second conclusion is… less obvious, but I am deeply convinced of it. I will explain why. 

Trump will not dare to punish Ukraine for its refusal by stopping the sale of arms to Europe and by stopping the transfer of intelligence information. These two conclusions are clear today, because I have already said several times that Trump is not a friend of Ukraine. And the position that he took six months ago — a sharp refusal of assistance — was his firm, initial position. He was forced to abandon it, to move on to intermediate options — maintaining the sale of arms to the Europeans and to Ukraine and the transfer of intelligence information. He did it because the growing pro-Ukrainian lobby forced it on him. That is the majority of public opinion, and the majority in Congress, including his own party, as well as a number of members of his cabinet. And the same will happen now.  

Trump's behavior was very indicative — I think we discussed it with you at one of our last meetings. During Zelensky's last visit to Washington — not the scandalous one six months ago, but the last one that ended quite successfully — after it ended, Trump confirmed his position, different from Putin's and coinciding with Ukraine's position: a demand for a freeze on the contact line. 
 
But on the evening of the meeting with Zelensky, it became known — and this was heard first from the United States, then from Zelensky's team — that he had staged a downright bandit attack on Zelensky, inciting his two pro-Russian attack dogs — Witkoff and Vice President Vance — against him... He shouted at Zelensky, threw cards on the table, shouted curses, and demanded that he accept not his — Trump's — position on a freeze on the contact line, but Putin's — with the surrender of fortifications in the Donetsk region. 
 
It was very important for him to squeeze that out of Zelensky. Then he would be able to reject the pressure from Ukraine's friends in Congress. He would say to them, including Lindsey Graham and other senators: "What do you want, that I be more Ukrainian than the Ukrainians? Look, the Ukrainians themselves agreed." That did not work for him.
 
And in recent days he has made another attempt—with these papers, written allegedly by Witkoff and illiterately translated from Russian by some, what was his name… There was a very good analysis of this in an English publication. 
 
Zelensky had a brilliant response to the US ultimatum. Zelensky's historic address was on Friday — the address to the nation. He said the famous phrase: "We are experiencing one of the most important, most difficult moments, perhaps, in our history. We are faced with a choice between loss of dignity and loss of a key partner." This was an unambiguous, clear response to Trump's demand for surrender. In fact, Zelensky said that Ukraine will never go towards loss of dignity and loss of freedom... That's why I confidently draw these two conclusions. This will be a very big moral victory for Ukraine...
 
- Andrey Andreevich, what's going on? Or let me put it this way: sometimes I hear that what's happening was a cunning plan of Donald Trump — that he wanted to make a gesture to Putin, but you see what happened: Europe against, the Americans against, the Ukrainians — completely uncontrollable. Then — Putin, go ahead, act. Could it be so, or is it just a coincidence?
 
Trump’s internal psychology — I’ve explained it many times on my shows. This last-minute, wild pressure on Zelensky, secretly, to force him to accept Putin’s position, the opposite of Trump’s — shows his true intentions. He wanted to force Zelensky to accept this and present it as a gift to Putin. And this would be his only argument against his own entourage. He works for Ukraine only to the extent that the Republican Party requires him to. Why? This can be analyzed for a long time. Especially his suspicious, disgraceful — costing him a lot of ratings — behavior on the issue of the files… in which there are things that are very painful for him. For example, in the recordings there are letters from Epstein to a friend in which he says that he was looking for a meeting with Lavrov and had already met with Churkin, Russia's representative to the UN, before the meeting between Trump and Putin in Helsinki, to give Putin good arguments against Trump. And we remember that meeting in Helsinki."

Overview of Trump's November 2025 "peace plan"

From the Rolling Stone / Yahoo!News:

"Trump’s Ukraine Peace Plan Gives Russia Nearly Everything It Wants

Mac William Bishop

The Trump administration has advanced a 28-point plan aimed at securing peace between Russia and Ukraine, which critics say would force Kyiv’s surrender to Moscow.

The plan, first leaked to the news site Axios on Wednesday, appears to have been developed in negotiations between U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff — a billionaire New York real-estate lawyer President Donald Trump has known since the 1980s — and Kirill Dmitriev, the chief executive of a $10 billion Russian sovereign wealth fund with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Neither Ukraine nor America’s European allies were consulted in developing the proposal.

Among the plan’s major points are territorial concessions to Russia; a reduction of the Ukrainian military by half; a promise not to join NATO; amnesty for all crimes committed during the conflict; a prohibition against European troops being stationed in Ukraine; forced elections in Kyiv 100 days after signing the deal; a prohibition against long-range strikes into Russia; and the establishment of a $100 billion reconstruction fund using seized Russian assets — of which the U.S. would get 50 percent of the profits.

Washington is ready to cut off intelligence and weapons to Ukraine in order to force it to sign the deal ahead of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S., according to a report from Reuters, citing multiple insiders.

“Right now is one of the hardest moments in our history. Right now, Ukraine is under some of the heaviest pressure yet,” Zelensky said in a video address to the nation Friday in Kyiv. “Right now, Ukraine may find itself facing a very tough choice. Either the loss of our dignity or the risk of losing a key partner.”

The U.S. previously cut off intelligence and weapons to Ukraine in March, after a disastrous meeting in the White House, in which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was publicly berated by Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance.

Months of efforts by Zelensky to repair relations between Kyiv and Washington — including a carefully choreographed “impromptu” meeting with Trump organized by the Vatican at the funeral for Pope Francis in April, the signing of an agreement to give the U.S. access to rare-earths minerals in Ukraine, and even Zelensky forsaking a vow not to wear a suit until the war was over (seemingly to please the U.S. president) — have now fallen to pieces.

Zelensky is under tremendous pressure not just from Washington and Moscow, but also at home, where a major corruption scandal involving key advisers has engulfed his administration and sapped domestic support just as the war is entering one of its grimmest phases.

Sustained Russian airstrikes using massive waves of drones and cruise and ballistic missiles have caused major damage to critical infrastructure, especially its electrical system. Rolling blackouts are common, and even with Ukrainians long accustomed to relying on generators and backup systems, the disruptions affect virtually every aspect of daily life in most major cities.

Direct attacks on civilians are also common. A Russian cruise missile plowed into an apartment building in the Western city of Ternopil on Tuesday. The death toll from that single strike now stands at 31, and Ukrainian social media is awash with the tragic details of the victims, including at least six children — and a mother and daughter whose bodies were found in the rubble, clinging together.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s military situation is deteriorating. In a recent trip to a frontline area in Donetsk in eastern Ukraine, Rolling Stone witnessed exhausted soldiers stretched thin, with evidence of Russian incursions penetrating loosely held and widely spaced defensive positions. Such attacks may be costly for the Russians — who routinely sacrifice hundreds of soldiers a day to keep pressing forward — but they are also taking a significant toll on Ukrainian defenders.

No reliable casualty estimates exist, but the best guess of governments and independent analysts routinely puts the dead, missing, and wounded from both sides at nearly one million, or more.

During his campaign for a second term, Trump vowed to end the war in Ukraine in “24 hours.” Although that clearly did not happen, a rehabilitation of Washington’s relations with Russia is well underway.

The Trump White House has systematically excised Ukraine supporters from its ranks. Mike Waltz, the former National Security Adviser who was hawkish on Russia prior to joining Team Trump, has been relegated to a meaningless ambassadorship at the United Nations. The Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg — a retired Army lieutenant general that the Kremlin regularly attacks as a hardliner — is throwing in the towel after being routinely ignored by the White House for nearly a year, and will depart his post in January.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a former Russia hawk who is also Trump’s acting National Security Adviser, has receded from a major role in the Ukraine negotiations, leaving them instead in the hands of Witkoff.

Witkoff’s lack of international, government, or diplomatic experience has led to missteps — including assuming a Kremlin translator in a meeting with Putin was sent by the U.S. embassy — but as a Trump crony and loyalist, he appears to be immune to criticism. The real estate lawyer was scheduled to meet with Zelensky in Turkey on Wednesday to present his peace plan, but the Ukrainian leader pulled out, saying he had a different plan that must be discussed in a broader format with European leaders.

While many observers had hoped Trump was coming around in his views on the war in Ukraine, the reality is that despite a variety of statements promising action at unspecified future dates, he has continued to treat Putin with deference. The Trump White House has taken no significant action against Russia to force a more equitable and lasting solution to the conflict.

Putin has proven adept at playing to Trump’s ego, often agreeing to meetings — such as in Alaska in August — and phone calls to discuss the situation, but rarely following through with meaningful commitments. A proposed peace summit in Budapest fell apart over technical details.

While Russia is suffering mightily under sanctions and Ukraine’s increasingly effective campaign to disrupt its oil and energy infrastructure using long-range missile and drone strikes, the Kremlin has little incentive to give up on its maximalist demands: the seizure of vast swaths of Ukraine; regime change in Kyiv; dismantling of the Ukrainian military; and the acknowledgement that its sphere of influence extends into Europe. The proposed plan would deliver these to Putin.

Setting aside the viability of the other points, a major issue for both Ukrainians and Europeans is the mechanism by which any promises Russia makes about future non-aggression and integrity of borders can be trusted. Russia has previously, under Putin, repeatedly broken multiple international agreements.

Europeans evinced shock and dismay at the Witkoff-Dmitriev proposal.

“All the decisions concerning Poland will be taken by Poles. Nothing about us without us,” wrote Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, apparently in reference to one of the plan’s clauses concerning the stationing of European fighter aircraft in Poland, which in practice appears to mean an agreement between Washington and Moscow to limit U.S. forces in Eastern Europe. “When it comes to peace, all the negotiations should include Ukraine. Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.”

The proposed peace plan adds to growing consternation in Europe — and among other U.S. allies — about Washington’s long-term intentions in the region. Last month, the U.S. announced it was pulling a brigade of soldiers out of Romania, and it remains antipathetic to military commitments in Europe.

The leaders of Europe’s major powers are now trying to contain the fallout.

“Ukraine can count on us. Together with [French President] Emmanuel Macron and [U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, I reaffirmed our full support to Zelensky,” German Chancellor Friedrich Merz wrote after a joint call with the embattled Ukrainian. “We will coordinate closely with Europe and the U.S., whose commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty we welcome.”

The proposed peace plan will certainly be rejected by Kyiv, and it isn’t yet clear whether it will even succeed in becoming the starting point for further discussions.

Another non-starter deal is a diplomatic failure — whether by design, ineptitude, or malice — and it means another delay in serious peace negotiations.

And that means the war grinds on."

Danish expert: Is Trump really ready to deprive the USA of profit just to help Russia win the war?

From the Dialog, Nov 23, 2025:

""To Push or Not to Push": Analyst Assesses US Opportunities to Force Kyiv to Accept the Controversial Plan 

The United States currently has virtually no significant leverage over Ukraine regarding the peace plan

Anders Nielsen, a military analyst at the Royal Danish Defence College, assessed the United States' ability to pressure Ukraine to accept the controversial 28 points of the peace plan...

Washington has effectively given Ukraine an ultimatum: either agree to a capitulation "peace plan" by November 27 or lose all US military aid.  

Nielsen assessed America's ability to exert pressure on Ukraine in this situation. The expert's key statements are listed below.  

 The Russians and Americans have drawn up a new peace plan—in effect, an ultimatum for Ukraine. Realistically, the Americans can apply pressure on two areas where they provide assistance to Ukraine: intelligence information and arms sales.

— The importance of intelligence is somewhat overstated. Ukrainians themselves have often deliberately exaggerated its importance over the past six months: this is done for political reasons to keep the US in the coalition. American intelligence is useful primarily for providing early warning of Russian air attacks, bypassing Russian air defense systems, and hunting these systems. However, Ukraine is capable of fighting without it. 

— A more important factor than intelligence is American arms sales. These are implemented through the PURL initiative, where Ukrainians prioritize the types of weapons needed, and Europeans purchase from the Americans accordingly. This initiative was seen as a win-win: Ukrainians get weapons, Americans get money, and Europeans keep the US engaged in Europe's defense through commercial interests. 

— If Trump withdraws from the PURL initiative, it will threaten political consequences for him. He is essentially foregoing profits for the US simply to help the Russians win the war, which will cause serious discontent at home and abroad.  

— Some commentators note that the plan is disadvantageous to Putin, as it will not achieve all of the stated goals of the "SVO." However, Putin clearly believes that this plan is far more disadvantageous for Ukraine: it will either cause a profound political crisis in Ukraine if adopted, or it will damage relations with the United States if rejected.  

— The plan is truly disadvantageous for Ukraine: under it, Ukraine loses territory, part of its sovereignty, the prospect of bringing war criminals to justice, and much more. The "security guarantees" in the plan are not clearly spelled out, and nothing will prevent the Russians from gaining a respite and then preparing a provocation in Ukraine's name to gain a convenient opportunity to resume the war. 

— Zelenskyy recorded an address in which he stated that Ukraine faces a choice: lose its dignity or lose an important partner. In reality, there is no choice: Zelenskyy will never accept this plan.  

— The Ukrainian president's statement is the first step toward softening the American blow and laying the groundwork for rejecting the ultimatum terms of the peace treaty and further diplomatic efforts to rectify the situation. 

— This situation also offers a lesson for European and Ukrainian diplomacy. So far, Ukrainians and Europeans have been trying to convince Trump that Russia is an obstacle to peace, while Russians have tried to convince him that Ukraine and Europe are the obstacles. And with the launch of the PURL initiative and new US sanctions against Russia, it seemed like the Ukrainians and Europeans were successful.  

— Perhaps Ukraine and Europe should now adopt a more straightforward and frank diplomatic approach so that their interests are taken more seriously."

Ukrainian expert: Trump's "peace plan" is a rag not signed by anyone, including Trump

From the Dialog:

"Zhdanov explained what's wrong with the American peace plan, pointing out a nuance that changes everything

Military expert Oleh Zhdanov explained that the so-called "US peace plan" has no official status 

Ukraine's political leadership should not sign Trump's peace plan because it has no official status, Oleg Zhdanov stated. Neither Trump signed the document, nor has Congress approved it.  

The military expert stated this on his YouTube channel. 

"On Thursday, Trump is demanding that Zelenskyy immediately sign the American peace plan, and then Driscoll will rush to Moscow with this plan to appease Putin. The delegation will leave for Moscow at the end of next week. What's happening now? First, there's no official document. Let's start with that. There's a draft of 28 points, but it hasn't been signed or approved by anyone," the Ukrainian Armed Forces officer informed the Ukrainians. 

Zhdanov emphasized, "The US simply threw us a written 28-point plan and said, 'Sign it by the 27th.' That's Trump's peace plan, but it doesn't have Trump's signature, and it doesn't have Congressional approval. Congressmen are rolling their eyes today and saying, 'We didn't even know.'" 

"J.D. Vance wasn't aware of this plan. He answered journalists' questions about it so verbosely that it seemed like he was for everything good and against everything bad: everyone must stop shooting, everyone must stop dying, only diplomacy can resolve this war. Under no circumstances should arms supplies to Ukraine be increased, so that no one kills anyone. This is J.D. Vance's response to journalists' questions about this plan," the military expert noted." 

Eidman: Putin's goal with Trump's peace plan was to split and destroy Ukrainian society

From the Dialog, Nov 23, 2025:

""Medvedev spilled the beans a long time ago," Eidman explained Putin's goal with the "Trump's" plan

The "Trump's" plan is a Kremlin's attempt to destabilize Ukrainian society, warned Igor Eidman

The actual goal of "Trump's" plan, whether Trump himself realizes it or not, is not to establish some kind of peace, however unfair, but to provide Putin with the conditions for continuing the war and the complete military destruction of Ukraine.  

Russian opposition figure Igor Eidman writes about this in his blog. 

Witkoff and Dmitriev wrote this delusional plan and handed it to Trump as if it had already been agreed upon with Putin. However, Putin has no intention of implementing it or ending the war even on such favorable terms. He has already stated this directly. He only needs the "Trump plan" story as a bomb under the Ukrainian state.  

Putin needs Zelenskyy to officially announce his acceptance of the American president's terms. If that happens, the Kremlin hopes, a split will begin in Ukraine, a mass movement against the current government—among the elites, the army, and society. This, by the same token, will weaken Ukraine's defense capability. 

Putin will then begin pressuring Trump and Ukraine, setting new conditions. For example, the Russian dictator will say he's ready to consider this plan only after Ukraine has already fulfilled some of its provisions: for example, by withdrawing from Donbas and the West ceasing arms supplies to Ukraine. In this situation, Trump will either have to admit that his plan has failed and that he was a fool for trusting the Kremlin's crooks (which, of course, he won't do), or continue to pressure Ukraine to comply with Putin's new ultimatum demands.  

Putin always operates within the framework of typical gangster logic: if you give in to him on something, he'll continue to try to bend the enemy ever lower. 

However, the Kremlin's calculation won't work. Its mistake is that Russians judge Ukraine by themselves. But Ukraine is a democratic state. Zelenskyy, by law, has no authority to accept many of the provisions of the Americans' capitulation plan. As my Ukrainian friends say, if Zelenskyy had followed Trump's lead, the Rada would have simply removed him on charges of national treason, calmly and within the framework of democratic procedures. And he won't do that.  

Here's a quote from Medvedev, where a couple of years ago, while drunk, he blurted out the Kremlin's plans to destabilize the situation in Ukraine with the goal of a "final solution to the Ukrainian question": 

"If this does happen (Ukraine makes concessions to Putin), a new, third bloody Maidan will quickly begin in Kyiv, which will sweep away the current junta and bring an even more radical one to power... 

The ruling clique, led by a rag doll, will flee to the West or be torn to pieces by the crowd... 

And then the time will come to finally crush the vermin. Drive a long steel nail into the coffin of the Bandera quasi-state. Destroy the remnants of its bloody legacy and return the remaining lands to the bosom of the Russian land," Medvedev wrote openly."

Grozev: Trump's 28-point peace plan initially had 30 points

Bulgarian investigating journalist Hristo Grozev on X, Nov 22, 2025:

"I happened to see an early version of the "peace plan" , about 6 months ago. It was a purely Russian concept and was nearly identical to what we see today (certainly the 50/50 Russian assets + EU investment in Ukraine reconstruction was there). 
 
However two items are glaringly missing. 
 
First, a proposal that US (investors) bail post-war Russia out of a pending cash- and investment-strapped recession, "like in the 90s". This was meant as an inducement for Trump (whether as a legitimate US sweetener or as one for friends and family, that wasn't explicit). 
 
The second "offering" was a new Russia-US alliance against China. A lot of "Christian alliance" demagoguery was included under that item. I am absolutely certain that this is a Russian, not a jointly developed, proposal. I also cannot imagine the Russians didn't include the 1st of the two extra items. I can see however how that wouldn't be part of the publicly leaked plan. 
 
On item 2, can't be sure if Russia dared to include the anti China offer. 
 
Again, if it did, it wouldn't be public. 
 
So all in all, it might be a 30-point plan after all.
 

 

Zelensky: Russia wages war for its right to wage war

From UNIAN:

"Russia is not fighting for territory: Zelenskyy made a statement amid negotiations with the US 

Yuri Kobzar, 23.11.25 

Russia is the initiator and aggressor in the current war. And given Russia's size, this war is being waged not for territorial expansion, but for the Kremlin's very "right" to start wars. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote this on Telegram. 

"Russia started this war—and only Russia, and throughout this full-scale war, it is Russia and only Russia that refuses to end it. Putin is waging this war in such a way that he doesn't care how many of his own people he loses or how many of ours he kills. Russian commanders don't simply want to act cruelly—they have clear orders to kill as they please," Zelenskyy wrote. 

The president recalled that Russian aggression began in 2014, and since then, Moscow has been fighting for "the opportunity to continue fighting even longer, and not just against Ukraine." 

Speaking about current US efforts to end this war, Zelenskyy urged people "not to forget the main goal" – to stop the conflict so that it doesn't flare up again. 

The president recalled that Russia's internationally recognized territory is already the largest in the world. Given this, as well as the Kremlin's willingness to make great sacrifices, Zelenskyy notes that Russia is not fighting for territory, but for its own "right to war" and the "right to conquer" its neighbors. 

"That's why we are working so carefully on every point, every step toward peace. Everything must work correctly – to truly end this war and prevent a repeat of it," Zelenskyy wrote."

Trump disappointed by Ukraine's lack of gratitude for his efforts to destroy it

From EuroNews:

"US President Trump says Ukraine has shown 'zero gratitude' to Washington

By Euronews, 
The US president criticised Ukraine's government, claiming it showed “zero gratitude” for US support, and accused European nations of buying Russian oil.

US President Donald Trump criticised Ukraine's government on Sunday, claiming it had shown "zero gratitude" for American support and accusing European nations of continuing to buy Russian oil despite sanctions...

In a statement published on his Truth Social platform, Trump described the war as "violent and terrible" and again claimed the 2020 presidential election was "rigged and stolen."

Trump argued that "strong and proper US and Ukrainian leadership" could have prevented the conflict.

Describing the war as "a loser for everyone," Trump said he had "inherited a war that should have never happened," blaming what he characterised as needless loss of life on failed leadership in both Washington and Kyiv.

Zelenskyy: 'Russia and only Russia' responsible

Hours after Trump's post, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on X that Russia bore sole responsibility for the war.

"The crux of the entire diplomatic situation is that it was Russia, and only Russia, that started this war, and it is Russia, and only Russia" responsible, Zelenskyy wrote.

Russian commanders operate under explicit orders that permit unrestricted brutality, contributing to the high death toll on the front line and continued strikes on Ukrainian cities, Zelenskyy said.

He also accused Russia of abducting Ukrainian children and attempting to "re-educate" them to eventually fight against their own country.

However, Zelenskyy expressed gratitude to the US and its allies, thanking "every American heart" and Trump for assistance that he said has been "saving Ukrainian lives," beginning with early deliveries of Javelin anti-tank systems.

He also acknowledged support from Europe, the G7 and the G20, urging partners to maintain it."

*** 

Update: Here is Trump's post. Writing about Ukrainian leadership, he put it in quotation marks: "UKRAINE “LEADERSHIP” HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS"...

Israeli expert: Ukraine must never give up the "fortress belt" of Donbas

From the Dialog, Nov 23, 2025:

"Tamar explained what Ukraine should never give up to Russia under any circumstances: "This is what you must stand for" 

Israeli historian Grigory Tamar called on Ukraine not to agree to give up territories Russia has not yet captured

Russians have been fighting for the Donetsk region for eleven years, but have been unable to capture it entirely. They will likely fail to do so unless Ukraine voluntarily withdraws from its positions as part of the peace agreement, stated Grigoriy Tamar. The fortifications cannot be abandoned, as they truly reliably protect the country from territorial seizure by the occupiers.  

Grigoriy Tamar voiced his warning in an interview with Alexey Gomon on YouTube.  

The military historian highlighted the key point in the peace plan that Ukraine should not agree to: "NATO membership is nonsense, a chimera. It was a mistake for Ukraine to even talk about it from the start, and even more so to hope for it now—an even greater mistake. But the loss of fortifications, which the Russian Federation has been unable to take for ten years—that's serious. This is something you must fight for to the death. This cannot be given up under any circumstances. It's like a hedgehog peeling off its skin, spines and all. Since Russia has been trying to take this fortified area for ten years and has been unable to do so for ten years, you must not give it up." 

Tamar also voiced an interesting idea in the context of the Ukrainian army reduction plan: "600,000 is enough. Isn't 600,000 enough for you? There's a wonderful sports club called Dynamo Kyiv. Ukrainians are a very athletic nation. You could train half a million young people within this club who would go and play sports, and sports come in many forms. There's hand-to-hand combat, there's shooting, there's grenade throwing." 

"Once, when the British banned Israel from having its own armed forces (there was no Israel then, but a British mandate), all young people in Israel played sports from morning till night. Drones are a 'wonderful sport,' and sports, as the British say, are for gentlemen, and all young people in Ukraine will be gentlemen, and everyone will play sports. And half a million such athletes, as experience with territorial defense shows, are a wonderful boost to the 600,000-strong regular army," the Israeli expert concluded."

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Europeans enraged by US greed

From the Politico:

"‘Witkoff needs a psychiatrist’: Europeans fume at Trump’s plan to profit from frozen Russian assets  

Multiple EU diplomats and officials said they feared the proposals, from Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff, would wreck their chances of the loan proposal being agreed by the EU’s 27 governments. European leaders had been hoping to finalize the so-called “reparations loan” deal at a crunch summit next month.  

A former French official, granted anonymity like others to discuss sensitive matters, said the Witkoff idea “is, of course, scandalous.” 

“The Europeans are exhausting themselves trying to find a viable solution to use the assets for the benefit of Ukrainians and Trump wants to profit from them,” the person said. “This proposal is likely to be rejected by everyone.”

One senior EU official in Brussels scoffed at the idea and noted that whatever he wants, Trump has no power to unfreeze assets held in Europe. An official from an EU government resorted to colorful swearing to express their dismay, while a senior EU politician said: “Witkoff needs to see a psychiatrist.”...

A diplomat added the notion of America seeking to profit from assets held in Europe sounded like classic Trump. 

The details of the American plan are far from clear. However, the full text of the 28 points make plain that the Trump administration has designs on the frozen funds, with $100 billion to “be invested in U.S.-led efforts for Ukraine’s reconstruction and investment,” the document said. “The United States will receive 50% of the profit from this activity. Europe will add another $100 billion to increase total investment available for Ukraine’s recovery. Frozen European-held Russian funds will be unfrozen.”

The rest of the frozen Russian assets will be invested in “a separate U.S.–Russia investment instrument, to be used for joint American–Russian investment projects in sectors strengthening global stability and mutual economic interests.”

The 28-point plan has triggered widespread concern in European capitals this week that Trump is preparing to try to force Ukraine to accept an unequal peace deal that would benefit Vladimir Putin..."

Trump's November peace plan was nothing of the sort

From Sky News:

"Trump peace plan: We could all pay if Europe doesn't step up and guarantee Ukraine's security

Dominic Waghorn, 22 November 2025 

The Donald Trump peace plan is nothing of the sort. It takes Russian demands and presents them as peace proposals, in what is effectively for Ukraine a surrender ultimatum.

If accepted, it would reward armed aggression. The principle, sacrosanct since the Second World War, for obvious and very good reasons, that even de facto borders cannot be changed by force, will have been trampled on at the behest of the leader of the free world.

The Kremlin will have imposed terms via American and Russian negotiators on a country it has violated, and whose people its troops have butchered, massacred and raped. It is without doubt the biggest crisis in Trans-Atlantic relations since the war began, if not since the inception of NATO.

The question now is: are Europe's leaders up to meeting the daunting challenges that will follow...

The plan proposes the following:

• Land seized by Vladimir Putin's unwarranted and unprovoked invasion would be ceded by Kyiv.

• Territory his forces have fought but failed to take with colossal loss of life will be thrown into the bargain for good measure.

Ukraine will be barred from NATO, from having long-range weapons, from hosting foreign troops, from allowing foreign diplomatic planes to land, and its military neutered, reduced in size by more than half.

And most worryingly for Western leaders, the plan proposes NATO and Russia negotiate with America acting as mediator.

Lest we forget, America is meant to be the strongest partner in NATO, not an outside arbitrator. In one clause, Mr Trump's lack of commitment to the Western alliance is laid bare in chilling clarity.

And even for all that, the plan will not bring peace. Mr Putin has made it abundantly clear he wants all of Ukraine.

He has a proven track record of retiring, rallying his forces, then returning for more. Reward a bully as they say, and he will only come back for more. Why wouldn't he, if he is handed the fortress cities of Donetsk and a clear run over open tank country to Kyiv in a few years?

Since the beginning of Trump's presidency, Europe has tried to keep the maverick president onside when his true sympathies have repeatedly reverted to Moscow.

It has been a demeaning and sycophantic spectacle, NATO's secretary general stooping even to calling the US president 'Daddy'. And it hasn't worked. It may have made matters worse...

With a partner as unreliable, the challenge to Europe cannot be clearer. 

In the words of one former Baltic foreign minister: "There is a glaringly obvious message for Europe in the 28-point plan: This is the end of the end.

"We have been told repeatedly and unambiguously that Ukraine's security, and therefore Europe's security, will be Europe's responsibility. And now it is. Entirely."

If Europe does not step up to the plate and guarantee Ukraine's security in the face of this American betrayal, we could all pay the consequences."

US bullying Ukraine: Sign this capitulation, or we'll push an even worse capitulation down your throat

From UNIAN:

"The Guardian: The US threatens an even worse agreement if Kyiv abandons 28 points 

Yuri Kobzar, 22.11.25 

Ukraine was not allowed to participate in the development of the plan in order not to delay the process, the Americans say.

The United States has threatened Ukraine with worsening the terms of its peace agreement with Russia if Kyiv does not agree to the current 28-point proposal, The Guardian reported, citing informed sources. 

Yesterday, after a conversation with President Zelenskyy and a call from the White House, US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, who unexpectedly became the peace agreement negotiator, held a briefing for NATO ambassadors in Kyiv. 

"It was a terrible meeting. Another the 'you have no cards' argument," one of those present told the publication...

Europe is concerned that the US and Russia quietly developed this "peace plan" behind Ukraine's back and are now presenting it to Kyiv as a done deal. Driscoll justified this approach by saying it makes the process more manageable. 

"President Trump wants peace now. The more cooks in the kitchen, the harder it is to achieve," he said, according to a source present at the meeting.   

Meanwhile, US Chargé d'Affaires in Kyiv, Julie Davis, who was also present at the meeting, told European diplomats that although the terms of the agreement are harsh for Ukraine, Kyiv has no choice but to agree to them or face even worse conditions in the future. 

"This won't make the agreement better; it will make it worse," she said."

Trump thought that corruption scandal would make Zelensky accept a bad deal

From Politico / Yahoo!News:

"‘The Ukrainians will have to accept’: Why Trump officials think now is their best chance for a deal

Diana Nerozzi, Paul McLeary and Dasha Burns

The Trump administration believes the moment to pressure Ukraine into a peace agreement is at hand, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy particularly weak at home and plagued by a corruption scandal that poses the most direct threat to his leadership since Russia invaded in 2022.

"The Ukrainians will have to accept [the deal] given the weakness of Zelenskyy's current position,” said a senior White House official, who, like others, in the story, was granted anonymity to discuss the negotiations.

And President Donald Trump gave Zelenskyy until Nov. 24 to sign on or risk losing American intelligence and military support...

The U.S.’ 28-point peace plan — which has been discussed in various forms for several weeks — would force Ukraine to cede large swaths of its territory to Russia and limit the size of its military in exchange for an ill-defined security guarantee.

The plan was presented this week just as the unfolding corruption scandal, which has ensnared Zelenskyy’s close allies, has imperiled his cabinet. Zelenskyy has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

The widespread anger at Zelenskyy over the scandal, compounded by four years of brutal war, has some Trump officials optimistic that the Ukrainian president will not be able to resist the offer, even as its terms would forever ban Ukraine from joining NATO, and cede Crimea, Donbas, Luhansk and parts of Kherson and Zaporizhia to Russia, while asking little from Moscow in return...

With Russia gaining some ground on the battlefield — but taking staggering daily losses in doing so — and polls showing growing discontent with Zelenskyy, Trump is pressing his advantage.

“Americans are talking to Ukraine with a language of pressure,” said a senior European official. “As the only option is to sign.”

Zelenskyy alluded to the dynamic Friday in a national address, saying the country faces a very difficult choice: either a loss of dignity, or a risk of losing a key partner.”

“Either the difficult 28 points, or an extremely harsh winter — the hardest one yet — with further risks,” he said. “A life without freedom, dignity, and justice, and being asked to trust the one who has already attacked us twice.”...

The draft of the plan has a U.S. “security guarantee” for Ukraine, but does not address how the U.S. would help if Russia broke the ceasefire.

Trump officials, while noting that corruption investigation swirling around Kyiv, say this is the best, most realistic peace proposal Ukraine can expect.

“This is a good plan, with or without Zelensky's corruption scandal," said a second White House official..."

***

This is so disgusting, I am out of words.

German media: Trump punishes Ukraine for being attacked by Russia

From the Deutsche Welle:

"German media on the "peace plan": Ukraine is being punished for the Russian attack 

Danil Bilyk, November 21, 2025 

The plan to end the war in Ukraine, prepared by the US administration, is reminiscent of the appeasement policy before World War II. Its implementation would mean Ukraine's capitulation, German media report. DW Review 

The plan for settling the war in Ukraine, prepared by the administration of US President Donald Trump jointly with Russian negotiators, is partly reminiscent of the 1938 appeasement policy and partly reminiscent of the Treaty of Versailles, with the difference that now the victim of an attack, not the aggressor, is required to renounce territory and weapons, German newspapers report. Implementing Trump's plan would mean Ukraine's capitulation and the destruction of peace and security in Europe, journalists note.

Der Tagesspiegel: The situation is reminiscent of the appeasement policy of 1938

The Berlin newspaper Tagesspiegel draws historical parallels with the situation on the eve of World War II. "Now (the situation. - Ed.) is becoming dangerous: for Ukraine, but also for Germany and Europe. Confidants (of the US and Russian presidents. - Ed.) Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have reportedly developed a 28-point plan for how the war in Ukraine should end. Ukraine did not participate, and neither did Europe. Ukraine must give up territory - even more than Putin's troops occupied, in particular the Ukrainian defensive line, which is currently preventing a Russian offensive on Kyiv. Ukraine is to be allowed to have only a limited army, and weapons systems that could deter Moscow are to be banned. In short, Trump's plan means the capitulation of Ukraine. The situation is reminiscent of the appeasement policy pursued by British Prime Minister Chamberlain in Munich in 1938. To appease Hitler, he went along with the partition of Czechoslovakia. The great war began a year later."  

FAZ: Trump's guarantees will be worth something when he deploys American soldiers to Ukraine 

The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) also touches on history and compares the Trump-Putin peace plan proposal to the Treaty of Versailles. The difference is that back then, the aggressor—Germany—was required to give up territory and weapons, while now it's Ukraine, the victim of the attack, that is being asked to do so. 

 "They are being punished with conditions unbearable for a sovereign country for Russia launching an aggressive war against their country, in violation of international law. Meanwhile, Moscow is being encouraged by the conquest of territory and the prospect of forcing the rest of Ukraine under its yoke. After all, weakened and demoralized, it will be unable to repel a second invasion by the Russian army, which is arming itself on a massive scale. But shouldn't the Ukrainians receive (as yet unknown) American security guarantees as compensation for their defenselessness? They already existed – in the Budapest Memorandum, in which even Moscow promised to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and borders. Trump's guarantees will only be worth anything when he deploys American soldiers to Ukraine. But for now, he categorically rules that out. 

Die Süddeutsche Zeitung: Ukraine's Capitulation on the Terms Desired by the Aggressor 

 A columnist for the Munich newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) believes that US President Donald Trump's policy toward Ukraine can only be "endured" with "humor or its evil little brother—sarcasm." 

"Trump's proposals supposedly consist of 28 points. But overall, just one would be enough. Then the document would look like this: at the top, the heading would read 'Peace Plan,' underneath: 'Point 1: Ukraine Capitulates.' And at the bottom: 'Signatories: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States; Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation." Because in practice, this is what it will result in – Ukraine's capitulation on the terms desired by the aggressor, forced through by two egomaniac rulers armed with nuclear weapons; behind the backs of the people who were attacked and who have been fighting for almost four years to avoid precisely this outcome. And behind the backs of the Europeans, who were caught off guard by what their supposed ally in Washington agreed to, and whose own security directly depends on the fate of Ukraine." 

Die Tageszeitung: An assault against Ukraine is prepared using diplomatic weapons as well

Another Berlin newspaper, die tageszeitung (taz), notes that the news of the American peace plan comes at a time when Ukraine is experiencing a "deep domestic political crisis," the military situation is "deteriorating before our eyes," and Russia is constantly shelling critical infrastructure. 

"It's at this moment that Washington once again takes center stage in its now-familiar, erratic manner. While Republicans are pushing legislation aimed at imposing sanctions on countries that buy oil and gas from Russia, a controversial "peace plan" suddenly emerges. It's supposedly the result of negotiations between Americans and Russians. What exactly it contains remains unclear, but one thing is clear: if Kyiv agrees to it (or is forced to agree), it will be tantamount to capitulation, and Moscow will then achieve its maximum demands. The fact that this initiative has emerged now is no coincidence. Rather, it gives reason to believe that they are preparing Ukraine for an assault, also using diplomatic weapons." 

Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger: Europe Has No Right to Crack Under Trump's Diktat 

The Cologne-based newspaper Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger (KStA) specifically emphasizes the danger the US-Russian plan poses for Europe. "This 'plan,' negotiated without the participation of the Ukrainian leadership and Europeans, is almost 100 percent in line with Putin's demands. A free part of Ukraine would effectively become a Russian vassal state, with Trump's blessing. Zelenskyy is under pressure, in part due to a corruption scandal. The Ukrainian population is exhausted by Russian bombing terror and is war-weary. So are the Europeans. But if European states do not want the peace and security order in Europe to collapse completely, they have no right to cave in to Trump's diktat. Putin has long been arming himself for a major war against Europe. Without Ukrainian resistance, Europe currently has little power to counter him." "

How much Ukrainian land Trump wants to give to Putin

From NDTV:

"US Plan Sees Ukraine Ceding Territory Same Size As Luxembourg: Report

AFP,  Nov 21, 2025 

France: The US peace plan for Ukraine could see Russia gain an area almost the same size as Luxembourg without a fight, according to an AFP analysis of data provided by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

The US initiative, seen by AFP, calls for the withdrawal of the Ukrainian army from territories it still controls, leading to a net gain of approximately 2,300 square kilometres (888 square miles) for Moscow -- almost the same area as Luxembourg (2,590 sq km), without firing a single shot...

The plan also envisages recognising Crimea, annexed by Moscow in 2014, Donetsk and Lugansk as "de facto" Russian."

The map below is from X

"Reuters published an infographic map showing the amount of territory Ukraine would have to cede without a fight, according to Trump's demands.  Trump's plan involves the withdrawal of the Ukrainian armed forces from the non-occupied parts of the Donbas regions — specifically, from the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration. See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo"

 



The only thing more pathetic than Trump and his men are his women

From People / Yahoo!News:

"Karoline Leavitt Tells Reporter Trump's 'Piggy' Insult Shows He's 'Respectful' by Being 'Honest to Your Faces' 

The White House press secretary told the press on Thursday that they should 'appreciate the frankness' they get from Trump

Meredith Kile

Donald Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, has addressed the viral clip of the president calling a female reporter "Piggy."

During her briefing on Thursday, Nov. 20, Leavitt was asked about the incident, which occurred aboard Air Force One on Friday, Nov. 14. Trump was speaking to a gaggle of reporters when he was asked by Bloomberg correspondent Catherine Lucey about the Epstein files.

After the president said he had a "bad relationship" with Epstein, Lucey began to ask a follow-up, saying, "Sir, if there's nothing incriminating in the files..." However, Trump cut her off, pointing at her and snapping, "Quiet. Quiet, Piggy." He then continued to address other questions.

Leavitt said the startling moment was evidence of Trump's candid nature.

"Look, the president is very frank & honest with everyone in this room," she said. "You've all seen it yourselves. You've all experienced it yourselves. And I think it's one of the many reasons the American people reelected this president, because of his frankness."...

"And so I think the president being frank and open and honest to your faces, rather than hiding behind your backs, is frankly a lot more respectful than what you saw in the last administration, where you had a president who would lie to your face and then didn't speak to you for weeks," Leavitt said.

"I think everyone in this room should appreciate the frankness and the openness that you get from President Trump on a near-daily basis."

Leavitt's statement comes one day after the White House defended Trump's "Piggy" comment in a statement to PEOPLE, which said, “This reporter behaved in an inappropriate and unprofessional way towards her colleagues on the plane."

“If you’re going to give it, you have to be able to take.”

The White House official did not provide any clarity on what made Lucey's behavior "inappropriate and unprofessional."..."

The Bild also thinks that Trump's November "peace plan" was written by Putin

From the Dialog, Nov 21, 2025:

""It's as if Putin wrote it," BILD on Trump's "peace" plan

BILD political observer Roman Eichinger criticized the US "peace" plan, calling it a threat to Kyiv and all of Europe

The "peace" plan Washington is imposing on Ukraine isn't about ending the war, but about appeasing the aggressor at the expense of its victim.  

This plan will not end well, according to Roman Eichinger, a political commentator for the German publication BILD. 

An expert offered a harsh assessment of the American plan. According to him, the document gives the impression that it was dictated by the Kremlin. The expert asserts that the proposed terms pose a direct threat not only to Ukraine but to all of Europe. 

"The American 'peace' plan for Ukraine reads as if Putin himself had devised it. If it were truly proposed seriously, it would mean de facto capitulation for Kyiv and catastrophe for Europe," Eichinger stated.

According to the observer, the proposed approach secures the captured territories for Russia, and, as he emphasizes, "forever." This, he argues, negates the very idea of ​​a just peace and legitimizes aggression.

Eichinger warns that the sanctions relief outlined in the draft will effectively return Russian dictator Vladimir Putin to the world stage. He emphasizes that such a rehabilitation of the Kremlin would constitute a dangerous historical repetition. The expert pointed to direct parallels: from the Munich Agreement, where an attempt to appease Hitler led to disaster, to how impunity allowed Moscow to seize Ukrainian lands. 

He is particularly concerned about the proposed security guarantees for Ukraine. Eichinger is confident they are meaningless and will not stop Putin from attacking again.  

"Security guarantees for Ukraine are not worth a dime, or rather, a ruble: Putin has never paid attention to such promises, and Trump changes his mind on the matter every week," the expert stated. 

He believes that such conditions not only leave Ukraine without a real shield but also push the aggressor toward another war.  

The expert also draws attention to Europe's position, which has been effectively excluded from the negotiation process and the creation of a peace plan. According to him, this is a direct consequence of the region's military weakness and its total dependence on the United States for defense.  

"Anyone so militarily weak that their security depends on the US under Trump simply isn't at the table when the new world order is being discussed," the expert noted. 

Concluding his analysis, the observer draws a conclusion that, as he notes, has long been overdue: Europe must become a fully-fledged military force. He calls for the formation of a pan-European army capable of defending the continent without regard for external players."